Wolfram Researchscienceworld.wolfram.comOther Wolfram Sites
Search Site
Alphabetical Index
About this site
About this site
Astrophysics Electromagnetism Experimental Physics Fluid Mechanics History and Terminology Mechanics Modern Physics Optics States of Matter Thermodynamics Units and Dimensional Analysis Wave Motion About this site FAQ What's new Random entry Contribute Sign the guestbook Email ScienceWorld
Mechanics > Lagrangian Mechanics v



Least Action Principle
    

Let be the -variation Eric Weisstein's World of Math (which is distinct from -variation Eric Weisstein's World of Math) of the Lagrangian L, so

(1)

where is the varied path

(2)

and and are the initial and final times, respectively. Integrating by parts then yields

(3)
where is a generalized coordinate. From Lagrange's equations, the term in brackets vanishes, so

(4)

since

(5)

where is a generalized momentum. The two variations are connected by

(6)

so

 
   
  (7)

where H is the Hamiltonian.

Now, require that

1. L (and therefore H) are not explicit functions of time, so H is conserved.
2. H is conserved along the varied as well as actual path.
3. vanish at the end-points.
These conditions lead to
(8)

But the definition of the action integral is

(9)

(10)

so

(11)

If the defining equations for generalized coordinates do not involve time explicitly, then the kinetic energy T is a quadratic function of the s,

(12)

If the potential is not velocity dependent, then

(13)

so

(14)

If there are no external forces, then T is conserved, and

(15)

which is a generalization of Fermat's principle.

Fermat's Principle






header
mathematica calccenter